Perhaps, the answer to this question lies in the press release for the sexy glossy, which included a quote from Johann Botha, head of Sciofon (licensor of Playboy), "We are thrilled to bring Playboy to South Africa, and look forward to continuing the magazine's tradition of excellence with cutting-edge journalism and high-quality photography ... We are confident that premium brands will welcome this new opportunity to align themselves with Playboy to reach affluent, well-educated South African consumers."
So MIMI-istas, are there undercurrents of prejudice (and dare I say racism) in the choice to launch Playboy South Africa with a white model? And if so, do we care—of all the things to take issue with, is an equal opportunity to be objectified as a sex object one of them?
MIMI Related Posts: Not Quite Black And White; Shades Of Blackness; Cut! Censoring Sex In Ghanaian Movies
(Photo Credits: Playboy Enterprises, Inc.)
5 comments:
I'm not surprised, white is always right /sarcasm/
That's why it's a good thing we have our own publications.
Should Africa even allow this magazine enter the continent? Babylon culture need not enter!
I agree with Mika's comment that there is nothing here that distinguishes this cover; what a wasted opportunity to do something interesting.
I'm with you Nicole, I don't think this is something worth wasting a second thought about considering the magazine itself is demeaning. It's one thing to have underrepresentation in high fashion glossies, it's quite another with something like this. Plus, might I add, South Africa already has FHM and Maxim and judging by their track record, it's going to be more white women. #ONTOTHENEXTONE
Wow, really? I don't think it's appropriate to turn a blind eye to prejudice just because we don't agree with the forum in which it is expressed. Wrong is wrong and letting things like this slide only sets the tone for more of the same in more serious contexts.
Post a Comment